If you've been preparing for a competency-based interview, you've probably come across the STAR (Situation, Task, Action, Result) method. It's well known and widely taught. But here at DEDICO, we prefer a slightly simpler version called SAR: Situation, Action, Result. Same logic, less clutter.
Here's why that matters and how to use it.
What is SAR?
The SAR method is a framework for structuring your answers to behavioural interview questions. These are the questions that start with things like "Tell me about a time when…" or "Give me an example of a situation where you…". They're common in Irish public sector interviews, PAS competitions, and increasingly in private sector hiring too. If you're preparing for a civil service competition, you'll almost certainly face them. You can read more about how we support candidates across all Civil Service grades here.
SAR stands for:
Situation (roughly 15% of your answer time)
Set the scene briefly. What was the context? Where were you working, what was happening, and why did it matter? Keep this tight. A sentence or two is usually enough. The panel doesn't need your full career history to understand the situation.
Action (roughly 75% of your answer time)
This is where the marks are. In competency-based interviews, panels are specifically assessing what you did, because your actions are what demonstrate you actually possess the skills required for the role. The Situation and Result give context, but they don't earn you marks on their own. Walk the panel through your thinking, your decisions, and your approach in real detail. Be specific about the steps you took and why. Use "I" not "we."
Result (roughly 10% of your answer time)
Land the answer clearly. What was the outcome? Try to be concrete. If you improved a process, delivered something under pressure, or resolved a difficult situation, say so. Quantify where you can, but don't invent numbers just to sound impressive.
Why SAR instead of STAR?
STAR includes a separate "Task" element between Situation and Action. In practice, many candidates find this creates overlap and repetition. The task is usually clear from the situation, and separating it out can make answers feel stilted or padded. By folding the task into your situation or action, you stay focused and your answer flows more naturally.
When you're sitting in front of a panel and the clock is ticking, simplicity is your friend.
A quick example
If you're asked "Tell me about a time you managed a difficult stakeholder relationship", a SAR method answer might look something like this:
Situation (15%): In my previous role, I led a project in which one of our key external partners had significant concerns about a change in our approach. They were vocal about their objections, and there was a real risk that the relationship would break down at a critical point in the project.
Action (75%): Rather than responding through email or addressing their concerns in a group setting, I arranged a dedicated one-to-one meeting with their senior contact. I prepared in advance by reviewing the specific points they had raised and distinguishing what was genuinely valid from what was based on a misunderstanding of our plans. In the meeting, I focused on listening first. I let them explain their concerns fully before I responded, which helped lower the temperature considerably. I then acknowledged what was legitimate, adjusted one element of our approach accordingly, and I clearly explained the rationale for the parts we were keeping. I followed up in writing the same day with a summary to avoid ambiguity. After that, I kept them updated at each key milestone rather than waiting for them to reach out, which significantly changed the dynamic. By the midpoint of the project, they had moved from being a source of friction to actively helping us resolve issues on their side.
Result (10%): The partner remained engaged throughout, and the project was delivered on time. In their feedback afterwards, they specifically mentioned our communication approach as a positive.
The bulk of the answer is in the Action, which is exactly where the panel's attention, and their marks, are focused.
A few things to watch out for
Keep your Situation brief. Candidates often spend too long on context and run out of time before they get to the part that actually matters.
Don't use "we" when you mean "I". Panels are assessing your contribution, not your team's. It's fine to acknowledge a team effort, but be clear about your specific role within it.
Avoid vague Results. "It went well" tells the panel very little. What specifically went well? What was the measurable or observable outcome?
Practice out loud. Reading your examples back to yourself silently is not the same as saying them under pressure. Record yourself, get feedback, and keep refining.
Ready to practice?
If you want to work on your interview communication and delivery, you can book a session with Sarah via Preply. If you're looking for something more tailored, including a full mock interview and personalised feedback on your examples, get in touch with Sarah at sarah@dedico.ie for a bespoke coaching package.
Frequently asked questions
How is SAR different from STAR?
SAR drops the separate Task step, folding it into Situation, which keeps answers focused and avoids repetition.
How should an SAR answer be weighted?
Roughly 15% Situation, 75% Action, 10% Result.